Posts Tagged ‘penis envy’

the girlfriend effect

There is a vocabulary to the emotions of human relationships and feelings. There are a lot of books about this; many firm, concise sentences have been declared. We may explain ourselves as a single word written one thousand times, or as many do, we may write nothing. There is a certain versatility to theĀ absenceĀ of words and the ambiguity of potential explanations. There is a perfect complexity to the formless abstractions that have conquered the uncivilized and turned our fears into markets. I like these a lot. I prefer to think that the mathematicians and physicists keep key formulas ridiculously convoluted so that only a minority finds them accessible. Their language, their syntax, their symbolism just as complicated as the equations that drive our global economy or our interpersonal relationships. Systems as complex and potentially unknowable as the weather. However, the wonder of our contemporary world is not in what we’ve found, but in what we’ve determined we cannot find. Our everyday reason is beginning to move in similar directions.

Listen: I have a lot of things I can’t discuss because the discourse would destroy them. A lot of things that can’t be talked about because they’re too obscene or not obscene enough. I’m wasting time even mentioning them, and it’s a problem we all have, every single one of us whether we know it or not. The variables are all best left as unknowable Greek symbols, inverted in cube roots and imaginary numbers. For the sake of my argument, we are going to substitute the language of mathematics with a bastardized English. I’ve wanted to create a thousand verbs to elaborate upon them. A hundred dozen nouns of materials, shapes, forms borne of emotions, expectations, assumptions, revelations. I’ve wanted to enumerate these visions and graph them from a million data points, between social capital and synthesized personalities. Big numbers to keep me company, wrestling these tiny fragments caught up in pockets of the dark. Hopefully we’ll never be able to do this. These are transformative ideas rather than explanatory ones: these struggles are the conversations we should be having, and we are beginning to realize their importance between hashtags and occupations.

READ MORE…

The 21st Century Distrust of Women

The 21st century single man is confident, independent, and assured of his success by himself and his peers, but his sensitivity and vulnerability becomes apparent when any woman shows interest in him romantically. Note the following: the man, by default, is not concerned with sex. The life of the contemporary playboy is not one of tail-chasing and conquering, but of regrettable misunderstandings and the importance of trivial physical contact. It is the woman who sexualizes the conversation in a practical fashion; it is the male who sexualizes abstractly. The woman has been socially conditioned to know whether to have sex with a man within the first few minutes of speaking, while the male’s perspective falls back on the ideas of “getting lucky” and “playing his cards right”. Every male action is inherently a risk-assessment; every female motion is perceived by the male as intentional.

READ MORE…

Short but Sweet: Fuck American Grammar

American english does it all wrong. When using quotes, don’t let the punctuation invade the quotation. Like this:

He said “hello”. Or, their names were “Jean-Luc Picard”, “William Riker”, and “Data”.

See how the periods and commas are outside the quotation marks? That’s because it makes goddamn logical sense to do that. You shouldn’t write punctuation inside a quotation unless it belongs there. Think about it for a second.

This is okay: he asked me “why is The Next Generation the best Star Trek series?” That makes sense, the question mark being in there, because it’s a part of the quotation and also completes the sentence as a whole. Nevermind the assholes who try to tell you it’s always best to put the end-punctuation inside the quotes, because sometimes it doesn’t make logical syntactic sense to do it.

This was a strange rant, but writers should appreciate it. British writers already follow this rule, because they grew up in a better country, and probably write a lot more than Americans.